Did the government intentionally mislead us over its deal with the DUP? | Gina Miller

ailedhoo:

Gina Miller, the lead claimant in the successful legal fight for a parliamentary vote on Article 50, looks at Tory policy in relation to their deal with the Democratic Unionist Party (in form of 
the £1billion “bung” for Northern Ireland).

Miller release to a
pre-action protocol

(PAP) that the
Independent Workers Union of Great Britain

has set forth to the government to test whether the laws were
adhered to in respect of the Northern Ireland payment.

The government’s lawyers made a surprising response:

“No additional funding contemplated by the agreement [with the DUP] has
yet been made available and no timetable has been established for the
provision of funding,” their letter said. “We have also explained that
additional payments contemplated by the agreement will be authorised by
parliament.” 

It appeared the Conservative government had not
admitted it needed prior parliamentary authorisation

before supplying tax payers’ money to Northern Ireland for their deal with the DUP.

With the prospect of
new “Henry VIII” powers

on the horizon Miller highlights a concerning aspect of Theresa May’s administration. As Miller states:

The British public deserves better than a government blatantly
attempting to put itself above the law and seeking to bypass
parliamentary scrutiny simply to cling to power. It is aware that the
public – and perhaps some sections of the press – have become apathetic,
and takes it for granted that awkward questions will not be asked. If
there is one lesson to be learned from all this, it is that we need to
watch this government – and all future governments, for that matter –
like a hawk, and be prepared to ask awkward but legitimate questions.
The price of liberty, as Thomas Jefferson so rightly said, is eternal
vigilance.

A corrupt government, putting itself above the law? 

You don’t say.   

Did the government intentionally mislead us over its deal with the DUP? | Gina Miller

odinsblog:

Social Media Manipulation and Electioneering: How the US Billionaire behind Donald Trump’s election also helped engineer Brexit


Robert Mercer, who bankrolled Donald Trump, played key role in Brexit by using using military disinformation tactics via Breitbart News and analytic data from Facebook

Cambridge Analytica, an offshoot of a British company, SCL Group, which has 25 years’ experience in military disinformation campaigns and “election management”, claims to use cutting-edge technology to build intimate psychometric profiles of voters to find and target their emotional triggers. Trump’s team paid the firm more than $6m (£4.8m) to target swing voters in the US election.

(continue reading)

scarimor:

the-eleventh-blog:

update from the UK lads

  • gove and boris, pioneers of the leave vote, are literally MIA. like…no one knows where any of the leave campaign are
  • the chancellor is basically missing
  • we effectively have no PM
  • the tory party are in the midst of a civil war so brutal john major’s tenure looks chill
  • there may or may not be a snap election
  • the labour party literally barely exists as its shadow cabinet resigns en masse
  • labour’s deputy leader, hero of the story tom watson, spent the whole of the leadership crisis last night at a silent disco at glastonbury, while snapchatting
  • this fucking hilarious video in which it is revealed vote leave have no contingency plan and the presenter literally ends saying “i don’t know what to say to that”
  • no one actually wants to press the big red button (article 50) to start the process of brexit
  • this conspiracy theory appears to be entirely correct. seriously, read it. it basically suggests brexit is entirely impossible
  • nicola sturgeon, separatist first minister of scotland, is effectively the only leader with a plan: that plan being the break up of the united kingdom
  • literally we have become a meme

“may you live in interesting times”

And this is why we can never have nice things.

disabilityhealth:

I know that there’s a lot of uncertainty and distress in regards to the UK voting to leave the EU, but the ageism I’ve seen in response is pretty alarming.

In case you’ve missed it, there have been many people calling for voting rights to be taken away from the elderly “because they’re not going to be here as long.”

A person’s worth is not measured in how much longer they have to live (would you take voting away from terminally ill people???) and oftentimes the older voters still have 20+ years left to live. 

I don’t think anybody votes for things because they’re old and therefore don’t have to live with the consequences. They vote the way they do because that’s what they genuinely believe (whether it is right or not). 

Discussing the removal of voting rights from one group of people only opens the door to a broader conversation as to “who deserves to vote.” (Which hasn’t worked out so well in the past.)

Disagreeing with the older generation is not a reason to strip them of their rights. It’s a reason to go out to vote in force.

Plenty of young people voted Leave.  

Plenty of young people who wanted us to remain didn’t bother to vote.  

You can be a xenophobic, racist, ignorant bigot at ANY age.  

somecunttookmyurl:

somecunttookmyurl:

somecunttookmyurl:

somecunttookmyurl:

Hi there. If you’re just waking up

  • Brexit won
  • The £ plummeted to a 30-year low
  • Japan has stopped trading
  • Scotland is pushing for independence
  • Ireland is considering re-unification
  • The Dutch Freedom Party are calling for their own EU referendum

Well, this took off whilst I went to sleep for a couple of hours.

An update:

  • David Cameron has resigned, a fact I’d never thought I’d be sad about
  • Donald Trump just landed in Scotland, because we haven’t suffered enough
  • Nicola Sturgeon says EU folk are “still welcome in Scotland” and “their contribution is valued”
  • She’s thrown down the gauntlet re: staying in and is petitioning the EU for membership. The result is “democratically unacceptable”
  • “I intend to take all possible steps to give effect to how Scotland voted. In other words, to secure our place in the EU”
  • Statement officially made that second independence referendum “highly likely”
  • The financial markets are a shitshow
  • Vote Leave have ALREADY backtracked on their two defining campaign promises (more money for the NHS, less immigration)
  • A motion of No Confidence has been leveled at Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, who honestly lasted longer than I thought he would
  • The UK have lost £350 billion so far
  • Spain could re-take Gibraltar if they wanted to make a move
  • Morgan Stanley have started the process to move 2,000 investment banking staff from London to Dublin/Frankfurt
  • EU leaders are calling on the UK to get out ASAP
  • The New York stock exchange is down 500 points
  • From the amount wiped off shares, so far, divided by 32m voters… the cost is already at £6,000 per voter
  • Donald Trump has come out in support of the decision to leave, which is how you know we messed up real bad
  • Everything is fucked
  • I’m so sorry

“It’s not legally binding.”

And to think, last year, we were ‘better together.’