Gina Miller, the lead claimant in the successful legal fight for a parliamentary vote on Article 50, looks at Tory policy in relation to their deal with the Democratic Unionist Party (in form of
the £1billion “bung” for Northern Ireland).
has set forth to the government to test whether the laws were
adhered to in respect of the Northern Ireland payment.
The government’s lawyers made a surprising response:
“No additional funding contemplated by the agreement [with the DUP] has
yet been made available and no timetable has been established for the
provision of funding,” their letter said. “We have also explained that
additional payments contemplated by the agreement will be authorised by
parliament.”
It appeared the Conservative government had not
admitted it needed prior parliamentary authorisation
before supplying tax payers’ money to Northern Ireland for their deal with the DUP.
With the prospect of
new “Henry VIII” powers
on the horizon Miller highlights a concerning aspect of Theresa May’s administration. As Miller states:
The British public deserves better than a government blatantly
attempting to put itself above the law and seeking to bypass
parliamentary scrutiny simply to cling to power. It is aware that the
public – and perhaps some sections of the press – have become apathetic,
and takes it for granted that awkward questions will not be asked. If
there is one lesson to be learned from all this, it is that we need to
watch this government – and all future governments, for that matter –
like a hawk, and be prepared to ask awkward but legitimate questions.
The price of liberty, as Thomas Jefferson so rightly said, is eternal
vigilance.
A corrupt government, putting itself above the law?
Robert Mercer, who bankrolled Donald Trump, played key role in Brexit by using using military disinformation tactics via Breitbart News and analytic data from Facebook
Cambridge Analytica, an offshoot of a British company, SCL Group, which has 25 years’ experience in military disinformation campaigns and “election management”, claims to use cutting-edge technology to build intimate psychometric profiles of voters to find and target their emotional triggers. Trump’s team paid the firm more than $6m (£4.8m) to target swing voters in the US election.
gove and boris, pioneers of the leave vote, are literally MIA. like…no one knows where any of the leave campaign are
the chancellor is basically missing
we effectively have no PM
the tory party are in the midst of a civil war so brutal john major’s tenure looks chill
there may or may not be a snap election
the labour party literally barely exists as its shadow cabinet resigns en masse
labour’s deputy leader, hero of the story tom watson, spent the whole of the leadership crisis last night at a silent disco at glastonbury, while snapchatting
this fucking hilarious video in which it is revealed vote leave have no contingency plan and the presenter literally ends saying “i don’t know what to say to that”
no one actually wants to press the big red button (article 50) to start the process of brexit
this conspiracy theory appears to be entirely correct. seriously, read it. it basically suggests brexit is entirely impossible
nicola sturgeon, separatist first minister of scotland, is effectively the only leader with a plan: that plan being the break up of the united kingdom
I know that there’s a lot of uncertainty and distress in regards to the UK voting to leave the EU, but the ageism I’ve seen in response is pretty alarming.
In case you’ve missed it, there have been many people calling for voting rights to be taken away from the elderly “because they’re not going to be here as long.”
A person’s worth is not measured in how much longer they have to live (would you take voting away from terminally ill people???) and oftentimes the older voters still have 20+ years left to live.
I don’t think anybody votes for things because they’re old and therefore don’t have to live with the consequences. They vote the way they do because that’s what they genuinely believe (whether it is right or not).
Discussing the removal of voting rights from one group of people only opens the door to a broader conversation as to “who deserves to vote.” (Which hasn’t worked out so well in the past.)
Disagreeing with the older generation is not a reason to strip them of their rights. It’s a reason to go out to vote in force.
Plenty of young people voted Leave.
Plenty of young people who wanted us to remain didn’t bother to vote.
You can be a xenophobic, racist, ignorant bigot at ANY age.