“I swear fealty to you, Clarke kom Skaikru.”
I know this scene is so well-loved, but it’s such a dangerous moment for Lexa (and Clarke, as well). It is the moment where she accepts and concedes Clarke as a better leader than she is, putting the fate of their people in Clarke’s hands (harken back to Lexa’s ‘advice’ to Clarke in s2: to be a leader her people can put their hopes and dreams into. For Lexa, Clarke is exactly that kind of leader.). From here on, Lexa will look to Clarke for advice or direction.
We always think in terms of her ‘betrayal’ of Clarke (at Mt. Weather), but that’s not how Lexa is a Betrayer. Her betrayal is of her people (to colonialist invaders in s2 – something Gustus warned her about) and here, after having been ‘tricked’ back into putting her people first (at Mt. Weather), she completes her betrayal of her people by putting Clarke first, swearing loyalty, on her knees, no less.
Lexa, of course, does this out of love and devotion, out of fear of Clarke’s endless hatred for her, in hope that Clarke will understand why Lexa had to protect her people first, an act just as devastating to her as it was to Clarke. As Clarke and Lexa, they are just troubled, lovestruck young women who would probably, happily, wish the world (and all their responsibilities in it) away. As Heda and Wanheda, Lexa wants them to rule together – something completely offensive to the likes of Titus (and others) who only see Skaikru as those who will (eventually) destroy their way of life.
The massacre of Lexa’s army might be the catalyst for Lexa’s death, but it is in a way as Titus told Clarke: I may have pulled the trigger, but you killed her.
It’s cruel: how do you blame someone for falling in love? For the likes of Titus, love, the ultimate weakness, is the ultimate betrayal.
Will Titus (and Gustus’) premonitions about the end of their people haunt Clarke in series 4? She suffers from enough needless guilt. Lexa sought to lift it from her shoulders. Will that haunt her as well?



















