Spoilers for Star Trek: Discovery.
I’ve been trying to keep up, still a few episodes behind, and I do not see much conversation about this show, though it is receiving good notices. This is just a bit of a ramble.
I think this take on the Trek universe is a strong one, but still needs some strong characters to connect with and fill out. It’s hard not to like Michael Burnham, or her relationship with Captain Georgiou, but it was cut far too short, far too soon (I know there’s more in the wings with this character, or a version of her). I’m not big on flashbacks, but I’d put up with them if it meant revisiting their relationship and adventures. As for her relationship with Ash, that was clearly a setup and I wish they hadn’t gone there (but her clever disposal of him after the Big Reveal was very good). I enjoy her limited relationship with Sarek, but I really hope they give some time with Amanda, too. The women in Trek are so often given the short end of the stick and the mother of Spock (and Burnham) deserves her time.
Speaking of – will they go there and let us meet young Spock? I’m going to assume there will be a reason given why Spock has never mentioned her to anyone before.
Lorca is an interesting figure, but I don’t connect with the actor’s performance. I would have loved to see a woman in the role (the casting is still woefully short of main female characters, typical for Trek), but that’s true of almost everything I watch. I could picture an Alfre Woodward or even Lucy Lawless in the role, someone who could add a certain playfulness to the complex, wounded warrior willing to do anything to win (or is he a Mirror universe rogue?). Jason Isaacs is a good actor (why couldn’t he have kept his accent?), but he doesn’t move much in the role and it seems too understated, just standard-issue stoic manly man (now, all this said, I do like Star Trek Discovery’s narrative of spinning characters from what we are led to believe – while Lorca is, from the gitgo obviously not what he appears – what if there’d been a little more subtlety?)
Suru is clearly an attempt at the loveable alien figure who doesn’t really ‘get’ humanity and while he’s well-acted, if he disappeared tomorrow, not sure I’d miss him. Do you really need a character around who can literally spoil suspense?
Cadet Tilly is cute and easily the breakout character Star Trek usually offers, but she’s cute in a really generic, chatty way. She likes boys, gets nervous a lot, wants to be captain. I enjoy the moments when she’s pitted against one of the older characters, being allowed to question them, or show she has some real skills, but I’m not sure where this character is going. There’s the obvious trajectory of a young woman losing her innocence and, perhaps, becoming a bit of a badass or a troubled sort, but it doesn’t challenge much of anything. It’s telling that the room she shares with Burnham has no decoration in it, not even pictures from home. Why is that? Unlike Next Gen characters who came with complex backgrounds ready-made, I’ve no idea where Tilly might be from. In fact, that speaks for most of the bridge crew who look awesome, but never get much in the way of lines or character development.
Stamts is kind of frustrating – he gets to experience something incredible, but we never really get to ‘see’ him in this experience. We’re always outsiders. He’s abrasive and funny (a rude character is always welcome), but, like all the other characters, we just ‘assume’ we know him. Aside from being told he’s a genius, what do we really know or care to know?
His relationship with his partner, Dr. Culber gave us some hope (and, I think, the first same-sex relationship given some depth on a Star Trek adventure), but that was cut short, too. In fact, I’m surprised there’s hardly any talk about Culber’s murder, the killing off of a significant gay MOC so early on in the series. Yes, one remains, but he’s white, too and that feels deeply uncomfortable. With Bryan Fuller gone, it feels like those in charge just did away with this representation without a thought. That he died in such a swift, sadistic manner doesn’t help. I wish there was more talk about this. If we’re going to get upset about the dead lesbians on television, we need to recognise this is happening as well. I’ve no doubt they will introduce another love interest for Stamts in the future, but is it likely they’ll get any screen time? This beginning doesn’t leave me with much positivity.
Back to Georgiou.
I’m intrigued at how early they killed her off only to bring her back as it were, with her alternate universe counterpart. It’s one of the best things about this series in that, when it works, it feels more like a multi-layered film or book and you can’t really predict what will happen or what to expect from a character.
In a Star Trek Enterprise episode, we were introduced to ‘Empress Sato’ – I do wonder if we’ll see her again and what her relationship with ‘the Emperor’ (Georgiou) is. Or will the Emperor remain in the Prime universe? I do hope we keep seeing more of Yeoh, as she is such a fantastic presence and it would be a shame to waste her. Though disappointed her ‘Prime’ version was killed off, this alternate take is a nice challenge for the audience.
Off, Rainn Wilson was wonderful as Mudd (did anyone recognise Kat Barrell as his five-second fiance?)
In all, I love the narrative idea it is building, very tense and full of surprises (and looks amazing), but I worry the current cast of characters and their relationships (beyond Burnham and Georgiou) won’t carry us very far and hope they introduce a couple more (or give that under-used bridge crew some names and storytime). Engaging with characters we relate to is so important and I’m not sure they’ve accomplished this yet.
That said, may I submit for approval the introduction of another Vulcan character, one who has never lived amongst humans (or any other race), the veritable fish-out-of-water, an engineering genius, perhaps who annoys Stamts with her insistence upon logic, and receives ‘lessons’ from Tilly, that both shock and amuse. A character often offended by chaotic human nature (not unlike Worf), with no interest in understanding it further (an anti-Data, if you like), yet compelled toward the dangerous side of her work. May I suggest she be played by this talented young lady:

Her appearance has been proven to improve a series in its second season, but, be warned – kill her off at your own peril.




